The judges, whose names were not immediately available in the early count, were appointed by Ducey, a Republican who served as governor from 2015 to 2023. Retention elections, in which voters decide whether to keep judges in office, are typically low-profile affairs that incumbents win easily. This year's results suggest a notable shift in voter sentiment.

The three judges were among those facing retention votes in the November general election. While final numbers are still being certified, the margins suggest voters have chosen not to retain them.

Retention elections in Arizona are designed to hold judges accountable without requiring them to campaign against challengers. Judges are evaluated by the Commission on Judicial Performance Review, and voters receive recommendations on whether to retain them. However, the final decision rests with the electorate.

The ouster of three judges appointed by a single governor could signal growing politicization of judicial retention races, which have historically been insulated from partisan tides. It also raises questions about the independence of the judiciary and the role of partisan appointments in shaping the courts.

Ducey appointed numerous judges during his two terms, leaving a lasting imprint on Arizona's courts. The defeat of three of his appointees may reflect voter dissatisfaction with the direction of the judiciary or broader political currents.

The results remain unofficial until certified by the Arizona Secretary of State and county election officials. Final certification is expected in the coming weeks.

This story will be updated as more information becomes available.