The suspension begins Nov. 8 and ends Dec. 8. Ogden may not perform judicial duties during that period and must complete an education course on proper conduct during hearings, according to the commission’s order.

The commission said it received numerous complaints and found that Ogden had acted unprofessionally and failed to ensure fairness. The cited cases included decisions affecting domestic-violence protections and parental custody—matters in which parties’ opportunity to be heard can carry immediate consequences for their safety and family relationships.

In one domestic-violence proceeding, the order said, Ogden issued a protection order without allowing the man involved to present evidence or be heard. During the hearing, she said, “the standard is very low. I just have to decide who to believe,” and encouraged him to settle.

In another case, Ogden allowed a noncustodial relative to take a child from the mother’s custody in another state without notifying the mother, according to the order. An appellate court later issued emergency relief reversing that decision. The commission also cited an order suspending a father’s unsupervised visits with his three children without adequate findings that the children were endangered.

Other findings involved Ogden disregarding a higher court’s order and directing a psychological evaluation after making personal judgments about a person’s “hostile” behavior. The commission also cited complaints about courtroom decorum, including eating and texting while a case was being decided and presiding in an unzipped robe over a shirt featuring champagne glasses.

Ogden did not deny the allegations and accepted the consequences, the report said. The commission’s findings underscore the importance of procedural fairness in family court, where judicial rulings can rapidly alter custody arrangements and access to protection.