Monday, October 19, 2026·Focal News

The Chicago Focal

Chicago's independent voice

Politics

Pritzker says stadium plan could keep Bears in Chicago or Arlington Heights

Gov. JB Pritzker says legislation could give the Bears a path to build either in Chicago or Arlington Heights while keeping the team in Illinois. The debate over public support for a stadium is also emerging as an issue in the Nov. 3 governor’s race.

Pritzker says stadium plan could keep Bears in Chicago or Arlington Heights

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker says state lawmakers are discussing legislation that could allow the Chicago Bears to build a stadium in either Chicago or Arlington Heights, as he seeks to keep the team in Illinois without what he calls a burden on taxpayers.

Pritzker expressed confidence last week that lawmakers could reach a deal after the Nov. 3 election, when legislators are scheduled to return to Springfield. He said the team would ultimately choose its location. The governor has also said a bill could move during the fall veto session or the legislature’s January lame-duck session, though negotiations have yet to produce a clear breakthrough.

The stadium talks are unfolding alongside the governor’s reelection campaign. Republican nominee Darren Bailey has suggested the Bears could end up in Indiana, where lawmakers have offered a package that would put $1 billion toward a proposed domed stadium in Hammond. But Bailey has also pitched his own plan to persuade the team to stay in Illinois.

A central dispute is how much public support, if any, should go to the franchise. The Bears have pursued a new home since the McCaskey family acquired the former Arlington International Racecourse property in 2021. The 326-acre suburban site was the focus of years of discussion about a possible property-tax break, while the team’s threat to move to Indiana last fall prompted Pritzker to take a more active role in negotiations.

One proposal, passed by the Illinois House this spring, would let the Bears negotiate a discounted payment in lieu of taxes with local governments. The bill included property-tax rebates for homeowners, but those potential returns were criticized as negligible. A separate Senate bill would have allowed municipalities to establish stadium authorities to negotiate terms for a publicly owned stadium; it failed to receive a vote in the House before the spring session ended.

People familiar with the negotiations say discussions have shifted toward the stadium-authority model. That approach could leave the door open to a Chicago site as well as Arlington Heights, a possibility that may matter to city lawmakers reluctant to clear the way for the team’s move to the suburbs.

Bailey says Pritzker should have brought lawmakers together sooner and negotiated a better deal. Bailey’s running mate, Aaron Del Mar, has also urged the governor to pressure fellow Democrats to support a proposal. Bailey’s own plan includes a payment-in-lieu-of-taxes incentive similar to one Pritzker has backed.

Independent candidate Collin Corbett says keeping the Bears in Illinois should be a priority, but cautions against offering a large corporate subsidy. He has argued that retaining the team could help the state’s business reputation without requiring a “sweetheart deal.”

Pritzker recently met again with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell as talks continued. The governor has said any legislation should give the Bears a choice between Chicago and Arlington Heights while protecting taxpayers. Whether lawmakers can agree on those terms — and whether the team would accept them — remains unresolved.

More from The Chicago Focal